Whistleblower Lawsuit: Lionheart Fired Director Over $10 Million Warning

Kerry Bedard says in a lawsuit filed this week that she was fired as Lionheart Classical Academy’s first executive director after she warned the board about an unsustainable $10 million lease.
Bedard’s whistleblower lawsuit, filed in Hillsborough Superior Court, claims donor Ophir Sternberg pressured the board to fire her when she started questioning why the non-profit charter school was paying him a king’s ransom to lease the 30-year-old Peterborough warehouse.
“Kerry’s diligence and commitment to the success of Lionheart’s students would ultimately lead to her termination at the Board’s hands when Kerry committed the cardinal sin of questioning a disturbing financial arrangement between Lionheart and a ‘donor,’ Defendant Sternberg,” Bedard’s attorney, Craig McMahon, writes in the complaint.
Bedard’s been silent since her firing last summer. But the lawsuit airs her version of a tumultuous period for the school. According to the filing, Sternberg insinuated himself into the school with the promise of a $1 million donation. For that promise, he got naming rights, a lucrative lease contract, and key allies on the school board.
In exchange, Lionheart Academy got a building that cost more than $2 million to turn into a functional school, on top of its costly lease, according to the lawsuit. As for the donation of $1 million, Sternberg’s promise was bigger than his delivery, the lawsuit states.
Bedard, who has a background in finance, politics, and leading nonprofits, was picked to be the executive director of the start-up Monadnock Classical Academy in 2021 by the original founders. She worked for months without pay to get the school off the ground, the lawsuit says, even writing the original charter.
But before it opened in 2022, the school’s name was changed to Lionheart as part of an agreement with Sternberg. A Miami-based entrepreneur, Sternberg, made a deal with Board Chair Barry Tanner to name the school after his business, Lionheart Capital. In exchange, Sternberg was offering to give $100,000 a year for 10 years.
According to Bedard’s lawsuit, that wasn’t the only agreement Tanner made with Sternberg. Tanner signed a 10-year lease on the 10 Sharon Road property Sternberg owns to use as the school. Tanner did not include Bedard or any of the other board members in the negotiations, the lawsuit states.
Sternberg bought the mostly empty warehouse for $900,000 in 2020 and now had a lease with Tanner that would pay him $10 million in total by the end of the deal in 2031, according to the lawsuit. As for the $1 million donation, Tanner and Sternberg made another deal. Sternberg did donate $100,000 for the first year, but then got Tanner to agree to take the rest in the form of corporate shares that turned out to be worthless.
“Instead, in December of 2022, with Tanner’s acquiescence (and, with Tanner as Chair, board approval) Sternberg ‘donated’ shares of one of his companies, which could not be sold for approximately a year after the donation and required Sternberg’s approval to sell at all,” the lawsuit states. “By the time the shares could be sold, in November 2023 (and during an interim in which Lionheart had paid Sternberg and his companies hundreds of thousands of dollars in rent and other charges), the shares were effectively worthless.”
Bedard’s lawsuit states she tried to get Tanner and the rest of the board to do something about the lease and the exorbitant costs for the school. Bedard believes the costs are unsustainable for the school. But Tanner was more interested in defending Sternberg, the lawsuit states.
“[Bedard] was utterly baffled by the Board’s resistance to doing anything of substance to address these issues. Indeed, then-Board Chair Tanner insisted, on multiple occasions, that there was ‘nothing to do’ about the issue, that the school had ‘no leverage’ and that the building’s owner ‘owes [Lionheart] nothing,’” the lawsuit states.
Bedard persisted in trying to warn the board about the unaffordable lease contract and the worthless shares, the lawsuit states. She presented a financial analysis to the board in early 2024 and made the case that Sternberg should be asked to donate the building instead of the shares, the lawsuit states.
Tanner left the board last year after pushing Bedard out. According to the lawsuit, Sternberg pressured Tanner and other board members to fire Bedard as a condition for him to make good on his donation pledge.
What Bedard did not know at the time was that Tanner had a business relationship with Sternberg. Several months after they closed the lease deal for the school, Sternberg and Tanner joined up in an unsuccessful attempt to buy the Hancock Inn. Tanner never disclosed that relationship, and denied it for years, the lawsuit states.
“Tanner knew that his previous business partnership with Sternberg was inappropriate, which is why in the fall of 2024, he denied any such relationship in correspondence with the New Hampshire Board of Education,” the lawsuit states.
As a board member, Tanner should have signed a conflict-of-interest form disclosing his business partnership with Sternberg. After Sternberg confirmed the Hancock Inn partnership to NHJournal, public pressure forced the board to look for Tanner’s disclosure.
“[T]he Board announced in September of 2024 that it had lost those [conflict of interest] forms, including Tanner’s. Whoops!” the lawsuit states.
At the same September 2024 meeting, the board announced a new $5 million endowment from an anonymous donor. According to Bedard’s lawsuit, that donor is Tanner, and the endowment comes with strings.
“Tanner is the source of this donation, and that the donation is a strategic attempt by Tanner to buy back some credibility lost when he sold Lionheart’s name for some worthless stock and a $10,000,000 lease,” the lawsuit states. “On information and belief, this donation comes with strings attached, including a ‘hold harmless’ clause, requiring Lionheart to indemnify Tanner against any losses attributable to Tanner’s involvement with Lionheart, and a ‘clawback’ clause, allowing Tanner to take his donation back if his identity as the donor was revealed. Kerry thinks that if someone is going to try to buy their credibility back, he should do it publicly, with his name attached.”
The lawsuit is on file and public record, but according to the docket, Sternberg, Tanner, and the other named defendants have yet to be served.