United States District Court Judge Landya McCafferty ruled Tuesday that the state’s new law protecting girls school sports from male competitors is a clear case of discrimination.
“This issue ‘is not even a close call,’” McCafferty wrote in her ruling. “HB 1205, on its face, discriminates against transgender girls.”
McCafferty’s ruling is based on the controversial premise that males who identify as females are girls in the same way that biological females are, and they are protected by the same antidiscrimination laws designed to protect biological females. The issue is almost certain to eventually be addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court.
As a result, high school freshmen Parker Tirrell and Iris Turmelle, two biological males who identify as female, are allowed to play girls sports pending the outcome of their lawsuit against the state.
McCafferty’s injunction against HB 1205 only applies to Tirrell and Turmelle at this time. McCafferty’s statements in court and her rulings so far, however, indicate she’s likely to overturn the law soon.
Tirrell and Turmelle, represented by GLAD and the New Hampshire ACLU, brought the lawsuit soon after Gov. Chris Sununu signed the bill into law this summer. HB 1205 requires New Hampshire student-athletes to play on sports teams that correspond to the biological sex recorded on their birth certificates.
The requirement that students stick with their biological sex at birth for sports teams is an obvious legal mechanism to discriminate against transgender girls, the judge claimed.
“Indeed, transgender girls are the only group whom the Act bars from playing on the team associated with their gender identity. HB 1205’s ‘disparate treatment of transgender girls because they are transgender is clear on the face of the statute,’ and this ‘singling out of transgender females is unequivocally discrimination,’” McCafferty wrote.
HB 1205 supporters have said the bill aimed to protect the integrity of girls sports and prevent biologically male transgender students from gaining a competitive advantage over biological girls. The bill also sought to protect girls from being injured by biologically male athletes.
But McCafferty notes that neither Tirrell nor Turmelle are likely to have any physical advantage over their prefigured teammates. Both children are receiving female hormone therapy and are not expected to undergo normal male physical development.
“Neither Parker nor Iris have undergone male puberty. Neither of them will undergo male puberty. Both have received hormone therapy to induce female puberty, and both have developed physiological changes associated with female puberty. It is uncontested that there is no medical justification to preclude Parker and Iris from playing girls’ sports,” McCafferty wrote.
Instead, McCafferty relies largely on an expansive reading of the 2020 U.S. Supreme Court’s Bostock v. Clayton County decision regarding sex-based dress codes in the workplace. However, Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, explicitly stated that the ruling only applied to the case the Court was addressing at the time.
“The employers worry that our decision will sweep beyond Title VII to other federal or state laws that prohibit sex discrimination. And, under Title VII itself, they say sex-segregated bathrooms, locker rooms, and dress codes will prove unsustainable after our decision today. But none of these other laws are before us; we have not had the benefit of adversarial testing about the meaning of their terms, and we do not prejudge any such question today. Under Title VII, too, we do not purport to address bathrooms, locker rooms, or anything else of the kind.”
Michael Garrity, spokesman for the New Hampshire Department of Justice, said the agency is considering the next appropriate step.
“We are currently reviewing the court’s decision and are in the process of evaluating the implications of the ruling. We remain dedicated to providing a safe environment for all students. The state will continue to consider all legal avenues to ensure that we uphold both the law and our commitment to student welfare,” Garrity said.
