Comments on: Romney flexes muscle in first NH Primary poll while Palin and others lag behind

By: Dianedavis1205

Dianedavis1205 — Sun, 09 Jan 2011 17:54:00 +0000

LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP!!

True blue conservatives put principles above party and do not want to vote for the “lesser of two evils”. To them, that is not a true choice. Tthe election of Barack Obama as President of the United States should have proved beyond all doubt that conservatives will NEVER, EVER LOWER STANDARDS.

I personally have no objection to a Mormon President of the United States if he is a credible conservative. However, conservatives must deal with the reality that there are many true blue conservatives who consider the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormon)to be a non-Christian cult and for that reason alone would not vote for Mitt Romney

By: angela

angela — Sun, 09 Jan 2011 17:19:00 +0000

Romney the father of Obamacare, are people dumb enough to vote for him?

By: Mary Nau

Mary Nau — Sat, 08 Jan 2011 09:16:00 +0000

Ron Paul would be my choice.

By: Blutstein42

Blutstein42 — Sat, 08 Jan 2011 04:32:00 +0000

Congressman Ron Paul is the perfect candidate to go up against Obama in the next election. He is principled and you will never find another member of Congress with a better voting record then the one he has put forward in his 20+ years serving this great country.

Ron Paul saw the US edging back towards war with Iraq back in 1997 and started speaking against it then. When everyone else was gun-ho to start another war with Iraq, Ron Paul took the proper Conservative approach and voted against it (War is never a Conservative ideal, more so if it is not in Defense). In 2003 Ron Paul saw the US Housing Bubble forming and spoke out against it. All during the 2008 election cycle he warned us repeatedly of the coming economic pain if we didn’t change our ways.

Shouldn’t our next president be someone who has been proven right by history over and over again? Shouldn’t we have a visionary as a leader?

By: Matt

Matt — Sat, 08 Jan 2011 03:26:00 +0000

Why do Americans keep cheering on these political figures that our manipulated media delivers to us – go Dr. Paul and others like you….principle over reality TV!

By: B2bdown

B2bdown — Sat, 08 Jan 2011 02:38:00 +0000

I thought New Hampshire was full of independents? Voting for the establishment dog does not seem very “independent” to me. Sounds very fishy.

By: Blonduxo

Blonduxo — Fri, 07 Jan 2011 22:38:00 +0000

So they have learned nothing since the last election? People of New Hampsire please do your homework.

Ron Paul 2012

By: MikePortsmouth, NH

MikePortsmouth, NH — Fri, 07 Jan 2011 20:41:00 +0000

Ron Paul’s fidelity to the Constitution and adherence to limited government makes him the only candidate worthy of my vote. In his 20+ years of public service he has been a steadfast proponent of personal liberty, sound money, free markets, and a non interventionist (not isolationist) foreign policy. He is the only candidate with the philosophy, vision, and ability to right the sinking ship that is America. Your vote in 2012 for Ron Paul will be a vote to return this country to the principles that once made this Republic great.

Brief Overview of Congressman Paul’s Record:

He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.

He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.

He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.

By: GreatScott

GreatScott — Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:38:00 +0000

Romney was the architect of Taxachuessettes-Care. Americans are just plain ignorant. This guy is another paid political hack for sale to the highest bidder.

By: Robert Burns

Robert Burns — Fri, 07 Jan 2011 15:46:00 +0000

Why this is bad for Mitt

1.He has nowhere to go but down

2.He will be the biggest target for the next year

3.If his numbers continue to stay this high, this will be like Iowa 1996 (Tom Harkin) and candidates will ignore NH

4.Or someone could come close and second becomes the new first. Ever heard of Paul Tsongas